Friday, June 28, 2013

Who is Kevin Carter?


Kevin Carter
Sept 13, 1960 - July 27, 1994


Photo by, Unknown
(source)


So who is Kevin Carter? "Kevin Carter was born in 1960, descended from English immigrants and devoutly Roman Catholic parents, Jimmy and Roma, where they lived in Parkmore, a tree-lined Johannesburg suburb, in South Africa. Carter always insisted he loved his parents, but then he told his closest friends his childhood was unhappy. As a teenager, Kevin found thrills riding motorcycles and fantasized about one day becoming a race-car driver. After graduating from a Catholic boarding school in Pretoria in 1976, Carter studied pharmacy before dropping out with bad grades a year later. He was then drafted into the South African Defense Force, where he found upholding the apartheid regime disgusting. In 1980 he went absent without leave, rode a motorcycle to Durban and, calling himself David, became a disk jockey. He longed to see his family but felt too ashamed to return. One day after he lost his job, he swallowed scores of sleeping pills, pain-killers and rat poison. He survived. He returned to the S.A.D.F. to finish his service and was injured in 1983 while on guard duty at air force headquarters in Pretoria. A bomb attributed to the A.N.C. had exploded, killing 19 people. After leaving the service, Carter got a job at a camera supply shop and drifted into journalism." (source 1 2 3)

Who is Kevin? Carter, Kevin Carter is........................................



Kevin Carter, Photo'd by, Unknown
 
 
So who did Kevin Carter work for?

* 1983 - Started working as a weekend sports photographer for the Johannesburg Sunday Express.
* 1984 - The Johannesburg Star.
* 1990 - Began working with a group of photographers known as the "Bang-Bang Club".
* 1993 - Working for the weekly mail, Quit and became a full-time Free-lance photojournalist.
 
 
What Era did Kevin Carter work in?
 
Kevin Carter work as a photojournalist from 1983 until his death in 1994. (source)
and photojournalism was beginning to take on the role of a serious profession.
 
 
 
 Kevin Carter, Photo'd by Unknown
using his Leica 3M (source)























So what Motivated Kevin Carter?

The biggest Motivation for Kevin Carter was exposing the brutality of apartheid in South Africa.
The photos below were taking by Kevin Carter, they are evidence to what motivated him to get evolved and share with the world the tragedies what were taking place in the world.

The photo below is one Kevin took of the apartheid that was going on in South Africa. I believe the main subject of this photo is what looks to me like a casket. It is centered and takes up about half the photo, spanning across most of the photo. The black and white photo makes it seem more haunting by the lack of the colors and the expressions on the peoples faces just intensify the photo. When you look at this photo you feel the anger and pain they feel.


 
 
 
The next photo Kevin took below is a good example of the rule of thirds. The man standing far left swinging a large stick like object, following to the middle of empty space and the last third of the burning car. I feel the empty space in between the car and the man is a symbolic way of showing a lack of hope and emptiness. The empty space of this photo to me is the most powerful, it is in this third of the picture I feel the frustration and the pain. The depth of field Kevin kept in this photo is great, keeping the man and car up front and the people behind just out of focus, leading all your attention to the main subject.
 
 
 
 
 
This last photo shown by Kevin Carter is heartbreaking. It is a perfect rule of thirds with the 3 different individuals photographed. The focus is a bit off but is effective because it proves how confusing this situation truly was. The picture is very simple, not action just a few children sitting around while a few grown people stand and stare. The feelings that come over me when looking at this photo is disbelieve. I cant imagine seeing this in real life, I cant think about how much suffering these people do. It is truly heartbreaking....
 
 
 

 Photo by, Kevin Carter
 
 
How did Kevin Carter capture these Image's and what technology did he use to do so?
 
According to sources, (1),(2). "The one he used quite often and was one of his favorites was his leica M3" (image),(wikipediaLeicaM3). "The Leica M3 is a 35 mm rangefinder camera by Ernst Leitz it was introduced in 1954. The M3 introduced several features to the Leica, among them the combination of viewfinder and rangefinder in one bright window and a bayonet lens mount. It was the most successful model of the M series, with over 220,000 units sold by the time production of the M3 model ended in 1966." (source).
"Before the introduction of the portable 35mm camera, hauling large, heavy plate cameras and tripods from one location to another took a lot of muscle and an incredible amount of patience and endurance." (source) Can you image Carter having to carry around the old style cameras or having to set up the process of wet plate photography. He was a go getter, always moving looking for the next shot, he was light on his feet and needed a piece of equipment that was convienant for his work. the new light weight Leica was just that. "The 35mm Leica revolutionized the picture-taking profession, and laid the foundation for photojournalism unfettered by problems of versatility, portability, speed, or lighting. Photojournalism, which depends on capturing news whenever and wherever it happens, had finally been given the tools to do the job as quickly, simply, and effectively as possible." (source)
 
 
 Photo of Kevin Carter w/his Leica 3M. (source)
 
 
 
Did Kevin Carter have any dilemmas with photojournalist ethics?
 
For all of you who already know who Kevin Carter is then you know this is a silly question. March 1993, in the Sudan, he took a unforgettable photo shown below, of a Vulture and a famine stricken child. After this photo went public Kevin Carter was attacked by every type of media and criticism known to man. Was it wrong? Was it right? Why didn't he choose to help? Why? Why? Why? Is what was asked over and over again.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

" This was not a mob executing someone. This was not a situation where he had to stay back for his own life and all he could do was take pictures and pray. This was a little girl, crumpled on the ground in starvation, and he sat and watched her and a vulture for twenty minutes, hoping the bird would spread its wings and make a more dramatic photograph." - Source
 

 
"No excusing it, in my eyes. I'm not sure of the impression or effect it was supposed to have, but my initial thoughts were if I'd been there to see him stop and take this pic, the next pic on his reel of film would have been one of him screaming in agony with his fingers bent backwards." - source
 
 
 
"I don't think you can judge a man without being in the shit with him, and not in this case at all. This was a famine and a civil war that went on until what... 2000 something? I even know of the guys who worked in the PMC's that took part in that conflict. Judge all you want I guess, I wouldn't want you not to. But I don't think he did anything wrong. Human life isn't worth much in a lot of places on this earth. You deal with that your own way or you take the easy way out." - source
 
 
 
 
 
 
So you were wondering if there were dilemma's in his work ethic's, did his work bring on any type of impact and what were some viewpoints on his work.? You decide........
 
The haunting photo of a vulture stalking an emaciated Sudanese girl who collapsed on her way to a feeding station won photographer Kevin Carter a Pulitzer Prize in 1994....... (source)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MY major at A.I.C is social sciences, it is a mixture of Psychology, Sociology and philosophy. How can the work of Kevin Carter not touch on my major in every dimension. The psychological effects that his work took on him was devastating. The horror, the pain and the suffering this man saw was unbearable for any human to be witness too. I cannot imagine walking through his foot steps on a daily basis. His works are evidence to the destruction that we can case in any society, his work shows everyone what is going on all around us and the issues he has shown will be talked about, examined and discussed for many more years to come........ I applaud him for his work, for walking the steps he did and allowing us all to see the world through his lens.
 
 
 
  Kevin Carter
 Sept 13, 1960 - July 27, 1994
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 





 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 









 



Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Does what motivates me, help motivate photojournalists?


Photo by, Jay Sanders (2013)

There are so many things around all of us that motivate us all in so many different ways. Some things are the same as our neighbor and some completely different. Either way though motivation is what gets us going and makes us go.

After being motivated by my History of photojournalism Professor John Nordell to get an A on this blog I started to research what motivated other people and what motivates photojournalist to do what they do on a daily basis.



 
Hansel Mieth
Photo by, Peter Stackpole (1936)
 
 Through my research I came across Hansel Mieth who was born in Germany in 1909 and immigrated to the united states in the midst of the Great Depression. She was the daughter of working class parents who went through much poverty and hardships as a child. When she came to the states in her early 30's you took any work she could find. She spent most of her time alongside the migrant workers and experienced their same hunger and fatigue. She lived in terrible conditions and after a few months she was determined to capture and show the world the life of the laborers and the life that unemployment creates. In an interview Hansel said, "If you want to be a photographer you have to discipline yourself and have to learn to be a decent human being". (source) I think this statement alone not only shows you what type of photographer she was but also the type of person she was. She was motivated to help people and felt by showing the world what they went through on a daily basis could help them.




Marcus Bleasdale
Photo by, Unknown
 
 
 
Another photojournalist I came across was Marcus Bleasdale. He is a British photojournalist and has spent over twelve years covering the conflict within the borders of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Marcus is one of the world’s leading documentary photographers and has used a lot of his work to help influence and open the eyes to decision makers and policy makers around the world on human rights and conflict issues. Bleasdale works cover a lot of underreported issues by mainstream media. His motivation is to bring attention to the world that we all need to be treated equally.




Lauren Greenfield
Photo by, Unknown
 
 
 
 
 
 
Another documentary photographer I stumbled upon was Lauren Greenfield. Her work mainly deals with issues relating to the influence of popular culture on how we live (youth culture, gender identity, body image, eating disorders, media, wealth, fashion). A lot of her work has been focused on looking at society as a whole and the connection between the American dream and ultimate expression of self and success. Lauren's work centers around trying to figure out why we let others influence our behaviors on a daily basis. Her warm and open heart has help shed light on many issues we/society deal with n every step of our days.



After researching and learning about some photojournalists. I have come to learn that a lot of our motives in life are the same. My motives of family and friends, freedom and health are evident in the works of the 3 journalist's I have wrote about on here. The hard work by the laborers that Hansel wrote about shows her concern as like mine of family and health.  Marcus Bleasdale's motives of human/equal rights could be compared to my motive of "freedom". I feel that the motivation to be a good person and obey laws allows me to have my freedom to enjoy, family, health and travel. The issues that motivate Lauren Greenfield center around society as a whole, as to who we are and why and to figure out why we get influenced by everything around us. Her photographic works motivated by eating disorders and body image connects with my motivation to stay healthy.



Photo by, Hansel Mieth

Photo by, Marcus Bleasdale
 
Photo by, Lauren Greenfield
 
                                
                                                             Photo by, Jay Sanders (2013)

Monday, June 17, 2013

Photojournalism and Bias

 
 
 
"Going Home" Photo by, Ed Clark
 
 
 

Depth of field: There is very little depth in this picture. It is putting the main focus on the Navy shipman not allowing us to really see what is actually going on around him. It leaves us wondering why are his tears falling from his face.

Subject's Expression: The main subjects face in this photo shows him overwhelmed with emotion. His eyes are filled with tears and you can see the pain that is deep in his heart.

Obvious main subject: The close up shot of the Navy man is very obvious to what the photographer wanted to make the main subject of the photo.

     Seeing the Navy man in this photo brings instant curiosity to me. Without reading the article this picture comes from, I would have never known why he is crying or even had a real clue. I had many different thoughts until I did. read the article. When I first saw the photo my attention actually went to the people around him looking for clues to why he was crying. Looking at the faces around him they all look like they are mostly disgusted or find something wrong with him playing the accordion. So to finally find out why he is playing I was shocked.





                                                                 Photo by, Jorg Badura
                                                                                 source




 What feelings does this image create: This image brings me joy. The warm colors in the background, with the nice dark cool water. The body language of the people jumping, just gives me an overwhelming feeling of freedom.

Keep it simple: The image is a very simple photo with 3 people standing on a plane in the water getting ready to jump off into the water.

Quality of light: I feel the lack of light in this photo is what makes the photo. The light that is being used is the orange sky in the background which is acting like a backdrop for the dark people photographed.


I feel this image to be true because of the Emotion it brings over me. Like Professor Nordell talked about taking pictures with different style lens to create depth. I feel here the photographer used a wide angle so we can see what is around the plane. I feel in this photo by it showing depth it gives a more impact to freedom. This photo was taken at a low level to make it seem like your really in the photo. Professor Nordell stated in his lecture that he stood on a ladder to take a photo to create an image. I feel here the photographer allowed us into the photo more by the positioning also.






Photo by, Unknown


Depth of field: Here the depth of field is lacking. You can not see anything else around the two men other than what the photographer wants us to see. It lacks the ability for us to truly see what is going on.

Color of image: The photo is taking in black and white. To me if this was an actually fight I would think that the photographer would want it in color to capture any bloodshed etc. The black and white choice here makes it seem to me like it is more artsy then anything real.

In or out of focus: The main subjects are brought into good focus but the surrounding objects are all out of focus bringing the attention right back onto the two men fighting.

I feel the biggest thing for me that brings no truth to this photo is the choice between color or black and white. I fee by this being shot in b/w it becomes more of an artsy photo verses being a true fight scene. The other part that makes me feel the lack of truth is the depth the photographer chose. Professor Nordell spoke about lens choice in his lecture video and how you could make the surroundings disappear by choosing to take the depth away. It is compared to nurses on strike photo of the 3 woman standing there with the up-close shot. It made it seem like they were the only ones there. Just like in this photo the main capture is the two men without truly seeing what is going on around them. I think logically about this photo also, meaning there doesn't seem to be much reaction of fright for the others around, I feel if this was a true fight we would see a lot more reaction from the others we can see around them.





Thursday, June 13, 2013

Ethics and photojournalism...



In March 2010 after the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake a 15 year-old girl, Fabienne Geismar was shot in the head by a police officer after people began looting the area. Paul Hansen and Nathan Weber were two of photojournalist there to capture the images.



Photo (left) by, Unknown - source


The “pictures of the teenager show her slumped face down over one of the paintings and a trail of blood seeping from the wound.” –  (TheGuardian). She is wearing a little pink outfit face down in the dirt with 3 paintings that she took. In one of the photos you can actually see other looters in the background and evidence of the earthquake from the rubble that is scattered everywhere.


Photo by, Paul Hansen (2010) - source
 

According to (Source), Hansen discussed the image and circumstances of Fabienne’s death stating, “For me, Fabienne’s death and her story is a poignant reminder of the need for a society to have basic security – with or without a disaster.”


Photo by, Unknown - source




Photo by, Nathan Weber (2010) - source
 
 

When I look at the images that were taken that day I honestly get confused reactions on the images. Yes I agree with Hansen that it’s a reminder that society needs a basic security, but I feel there are other images that could show a need for security also. I couldn’t see another human being lying in a pool of blood and not try to do something. Even if she was dead already I couldn’t leave a little girl lying face down in the dirt. I can’t believe someone didn’t have the decency to cover her up so she didn’t become a “photo Shoot”. 





Attached below are two related links to the Earthquake in Haiti
Video 1
Video 2

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

The little blonde...









In 1936 the Spanish Civil War broke out in Spain till 1939 between a rebel group and the established loyal Republicans. The Nationalists prevailed, and General Franco went on to rule Spain for the next 36 years and Gerda Taro was there to capture many of its images.



  Photo (Left) by, Unknown. Image Source


                                                                                                  Photo (Above) By, Gerda Taro (1937) Image Source                                                                                                                 

Gerda Taro (real name Gerta Pohorylle) was regarded as the first female war photojournalist. Taro was born into a middle class Jewish family in Germany in 1910 and lived there till 1929 when her family moved just before the beginning of Nazi Germany. Taro opposed the Nazi party and join a leftist group and in 1933 was arrested detained for distributing anti-Nazi propaganda then her entire household was forced to leave Nazi Germany towards different destinations and never saw her family again.

 
Photo'd above by, Cornell Capa (1936) "Gerda Taro and soldier, Córdoba Front, Spain," 1936, by Mr. Capa. After her brief career ended, a flood of photographs of World War II helped push her work off the stage and Ms. Taro all but disappeared from public consciousness.


According to Wikipedia “When the Spanish Civil War broke out (1936), Gerda Taro travelled to Barcelona, Spain, to cover the events with Capa and David "Chim" Seymour.  This is where Taro acquired the nickname of La pequeña rubia ("The little blonde"). Always together under the common, bogus signature of Robert Capa, they were successful through many important publications. Their early war photos are distinguishable since Taro used a Rollei camera which rendered squared photographs while Capa produced rectangular Leica pictures. 

Below Gerda Photo'd "Three Republican soldiers on a field telephone, Segovia Front, Spain, June 1937 that appeared in the Parisian newspaper Ce Soir and in the French magazine Regards.- (NYtimes) Her photo below is very simple with the three men seated, broken down well into thirds and the use of her shadows makes the photo seem a bit gloomy bringing out the emotion of war.

 

Photo By, Gerda Tora - Source
 
 
During the retreat from the Republican army in 1937 Taro captured the image below of Republican soldiers at the Navacerrada Pass in Spain. The photo's main objective was to show the impact and causalities that the war was having through the obvious main subject in this photo. The depth of the photo keeps you up-close so you can get the full view and get an instant reaction. Shortly after this photo was taken Taro hopped onto a footboard car full of wounded soldiers when it collided with a tank. Taro was critical injury during the crash and was pronounced dead the next morning at the young age of 27 years old. - Wikipedia, NYtimes

Photo by, Gerda Tora - Source
 
“Ms. Taro’s work was published in the Parisian newspaper Ce Soir and in the French magazine Regards, among other places; in the United States, her death was reported in Life magazine, which also ran some of her photographs.” Source: NYtimes 



Some more of Gerda Tora's photo's below.

 
In or out of Focus: The boy pictured front is in focus to put the main focus on the main and hold your eye to him not his surrounding.
 
Keep it Simple: This photo is kept very simple, a picture of a young boy surrounded by evidence of war.
 
Depth of field: I think she did a good job here keeping the object (boy) up close enough to keep our attention.
 
 
Use of shadows: The use of shadows here is great. Most of the photo is keep dark in the shadows allowing the light in one section to make the young man a focus point.
 
Rule of thirds: I think in this photo she should of framed/placed the boys a little further to the left. There a bit off center and my eye is drawn to the center and not the entire photo.
 
What is the Image: The image is in black and white, I feel the dark colors gives it a gloomy touch to it and makes me relate it more to the coldness of war.
 
 
Quality of light: The quality light here is poor but I think it helps focus in on the men running. the lack of light actually makes the men stand out more.
 
Contrast: With the men in all dark clothing and the sky so light. It makes the main objects contrast against the sky bringing it more impact.
 
What in the image helped create a feeling: The men fleeing or attacking? It brings instant curiosity to why they are running


Related Article

More Gerda Tora Image's


 

Friday, June 7, 2013

Technology Timeline....

   According to Wikipedia, Photography (derived from the Greek photos- for "light" and -graphos for "drawing") "is the art, science and practice of creating durable images by recording light or other electromagnetic radiation, either chemically by means of a light-sensitive material such as photographic film, or electronically by means of an image sensor."
 
   Photographs have been around for over a hundred years now and have gone through many different changes and styles. From the wet collodion process where someone had to carry around numerous pieces of equipment, [1] chemicals etc.. to nowadays only needing to carry a tiny hand held cell phone with a built in camera, where your only concern is making sure the phones battery is charged.. but how did we get where we are today?   
 
Photo below by, Jay Sanders (2013) 
In the early1800's a man named Thomas Wedgwood (Image) made the first known attempt to capture an image by means of a camera. It was called an "obscura box" or "camera obscura" [1] [2] [3]. These boxes were usually used for drawings and used paper or white leather that had been treated with nitrate.
In direct sunlight this process could capture most shadows of the objects and even made shadow-copies of paintings on glass. So how could this camera be used without direct sunlight?, it couldn't!

  It is said that, in 1802 the "the images formed by means of a camera obscura have been found too faint to produce, in any moderate time, an effect upon the nitrate of silver." The shadow images eventually darkened all over because "no attempts that have been made to prevent the uncolored part of the copy or profile from being acted upon by light have as yet been successful." - Wikipedia

 The process called the wet collodion (video) was invented and introduced in the 1850's by a gentleman named Frederic S. Archer, (Image). This Style succeed other styles of photographer and was produced on glass plates to leave and make a detailed negative to print from. This process was very time consuming and can be broken down in equally critical steps. (Wikipedia).

Photo below by, Jay Sanders (2013)
   Preparing the plate consists of cleaning, dusting the glass plate making sure nothing is left on the plate. Then the mixing of the chemicals to get ready for the photograph, this mixture of chemicals alone after being made had to sit for roughly a week before it could even been used. Sensitizing the plate or "flowing the plate" (video) is where the collodion (chemicals) are carefully poured on the glass plate and spread evenly.
The next step of this process is called the "exposure Stage". At this part of the process the photographer is setting up the camera, getting his picture into focus and setting up the lighting etc. 
After this step is set up it can not be changed without ruining the photo so attention to detail here is crucial. Developing the plate comes next in the wet collodion process. at this stage of the process the glass plats are removed from the camera cleaned, varnished, and finally preparations are made before going to print. This can give you a rough idea how long this process actually took just to take one single still photo. (GettyEdu), (Blog Post) [1] [2] [3]





All photography was originally monochrome, [1] or Black-and-White. [1] [2]. Even after color film was readily available, black-and-white photography continued to dominate for decades, due to its lower cost and its "classic" photographic look. It is important to note that some monochromatic pictures are not always pure blacks and whites, but also contain other hues depending on the process. The cyanotype [1] process produces an image composed of blue tones. Besides lacking color another big thing that photos were lacking was the ability to freeze a picture that was in motion. Up until film was introduced objects etc. had to hold very still so that way the image would come out clear and would not be blurry. (Wikipedia)

 
 

Photo above by, Jay Sanders (2013)
Photo (left) by, Jay Sanders (2013)



The series of three picture on the left shows you an example of how photographs have progressed through the years.

The woman photographed in this photo is my Grandmother, Helen Perry (Wagener). The first photo was of her as a child in Binghamton, NY in 1912, the second (middle) black and white photo was taken in Sept, 1967 and the last colored photo was in 1994.












     Another good example to see how photography has progressed are through looking at old baseball cards. Pictured below are two cards of Nolan Ryan sold by Topps manufacturing company the one on the left is from 1969 and the one on the right from 1994. Instantly you can see the difference in quality. The colors are drastically different  and in the (69) card it shows no movement whereas, the (94) card you can see the baseball being thrown in the air, freezing movement. The quality of the image and being able to capture/freeze movement are two drastic changes in photography. Seeing these two examples leads us into the whole new era of color and movement.



 
Photo by, Jay Sanders (2013) personal collection
 
 
Photo by, Jay Sanders (2013) Personal collection
1969, 1994 Nolan Ryan, 1968 Mickey Mantle
Black & White photo of
Lon Warneke, Aug 3rd, 1937
 
 
 
Photo created and pictured by, Jay Sanders(2013)
 
The Evolution of the Camera (Click Here)
 
 
 With the birth of Kodak came another great leap to photographer.  The founder, George Eastman (Image) paved the way for use of photographic film and started manufacturing paper film in 1885.  His first camera, which he called the "Kodak," was first offered for sale in 1888. It was a very simple box camera with a fixed-focus lens and single shutter speed.The Kodak came pre-loaded with enough film for 100 exposures and needed to be sent back to the factory for processing and reloading when the roll was finished.
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Watch Out Film
Here Comes Digital
 
 
* * Click Here **

 
 

Throw away the film, save your self the gas and pick up a digital camera. With the invention of the digital camera came a very time effective and easy way to take, share and store your photos. There was no longer a need to take photos, package them back up, drive to the store to ship them back to the manufacture to process then wait 2 weeks to get them back.

According to Wikipedia, "In 1981, Sony unveiled the first consumer camera to use a charge-coupled device for imaging, eliminating the need for film: the Sony Mavica [1]. While the Mavica saved images to disk, the images were displayed on television, and the camera was not fully digital. In 1991, Kodak unveiled the DCS 100 [1] [2], the first commercially available digital single lens reflex camera. Although its high cost precluded uses other than photojournalism and professional photography, commercial digital photography was born."


Sony Mavica Camera MVC-FD71



 

 
  

                                       


With  today’s technology always changing it has made it possible for almost every person walking down the street to be able to snap off a piece of history by taking a photo.  Anyone that has a cell phone nowadays most likely has a camera feature on the phone and can allow almost anyone to become an instant photojournalist. A cell phone camera allows an individual to take still photographs and some even video.  According to Wikipedia, “Most camera phones are simpler than separate digital cameras however; their usual fixed focus lenses and smaller sensors limit their performance in poor lighting. Lacking a physical shutter, most have a long shutter lag. Flash, where present, is usually weak” but the convenience of having a cell phone with the added feature of a camera is a plus that you gain. Within seconds of capturing a photo you can have it uploading  and shared over wireless transmission onto many social media sites like facebook, twitter, or blogger. Verizon wireless is now even offering a camera (Samsung Galaxy Camera) that is connected to their wireless service that can instantly upload your photos to instagram.